Whistleblower Disclosures Involving FBI Investigation of Trump

Whistleblower disclosures reveal an anti-Trump FBI agent broke protocol and played a critical role in opening an investigation related to the 2020 election. The investigation, known as 'Arctic Frost,' tied President Donald Trump to the probe without sufficient predication. The agent, Timothy Thibault, was fired for violating the Hatch Act due to his political posts on social media. Special Counsel Jack Smith led the investigation into Trump's retention of classified documents and whether he obstructed the federal government's investigation.

Indictment against Donald Trump in 2023

Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on an indictment against Donald Trump in 2023 in Washington, D.C. The Justice Department plans to release only the first volume of the final report on Trump's cases tied to the 2020 election, while the second volume regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago will be available to top members of House and Senate judiciary committees upon request.

Release of Special Counsel Jack Smith's Report on 2020 Election Interference

Attorney General Merrick Garland plans to release Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on the 2020 election interference case against President-elect Trump, with limited disclosure to Congress and the public. Volume Two will not be released due to ongoing criminal proceedings. Federal Judge temporarily blocks the release of the report at the request of Trump's co-defendants. Smith was investigating Trump and allies for attempting to overturn the election results and for keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

Dismissal of Federal Criminal Cases Against President-elect Donald Trump

Special Counsel Jack Smith is dismissing federal criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump, citing the prohibition on indicting a sitting President. This marks a major victory for Trump and the rule of law, with two state-level cases remaining in Georgia and New York.

Response to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's Criticism

Special Counsel Jack Smith responds to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's questioning of his legitimacy by pointing out that the Attorney General is authorized to appoint a Special Counsel. There is ongoing debate and legal actions regarding Trump's immunity and Smith's appointment.

Analysis of CNN Presidential Debate and President Biden's Performance

Aftermath of CNN's Presidential Debate and President Biden's big-dollar fundraising efforts analyzed by Fox News reporter. Former President Trump accepted first debate without conditions, while Biden is criticized for declining health and debate performance. Supreme Court's decision halts Special Counsel Jack Smith, impacting Democrats' strategy. Fox News opinion piece calls for Biden to drop out. Article criticizes debate questions for not focusing on important issues like China, Iran, and antisemitism.

Supreme Court Decision on Presidential Immunity and Special Counsel Appointment

Justice Clarence Thomas questions the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment in a concurring opinion to a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. Thomas argues that Smith's appointment may violate the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, raising concerns about the legality of the prosecution of President Donald Trump by Smith. Thomas suggests that lower courts need to address these issues before the prosecution can proceed.

House Republicans' Efforts to Target Prosecutions Against Former President Trump

House Republicans are aiming to introduce amendments to the Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations bill that would target the prosecutions against former President Trump. Trump's allies are planning to defund Special Counsel Jack Smith. The bill cuts the Justice Department's funding by nearly $1 billion and includes cuts to the FBI's budget.

Legal Battle Over Trump's Handling of Classified Documents

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon denied former President Donald Trump’s request to dismiss the documents case, rejecting the argument that the Presidential Records Act takes priority over the Espionage Act. Special Counsel Jack Smith criticized Cannon's stance on the case.

Legal Dispute Involving Donald Trump and Special Counsel Jack Smith

Former President Donald Trump calls for Special Counsel Jack Smith to be sanctioned or censured for allegedly mishandling classified documents and attacking Judge Aileen Cannon. Trump's defense states he had broad authority under the Presidential Records Act. The case is ongoing in the U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division.

Disagreement Over Trump's Claim on Presidential Records

Former White House officials dispute Donald Trump's claim of designating presidential records as personal, crucial to his defense in a classified documents case. Special Counsel Jack Smith's filing reveals no recollection from officials of such designation. Trump faces accusations of retaining classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and obstructing retrieval efforts.

Federal Criminal Case Against Former President Donald Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith has requested a July 8 trial start date in the federal criminal case over former President Trump's handling of classified documents. Trump, facing four criminal indictments, is leveraging delay tactics to push proceedings past the 2024 election.