Nationwide Injunctions and the Role of the Judiciary

Senate Judiciary Committee member John Kennedy, R-La., discusses his views on nationwide injunctions and the role of the judiciary in creating laws. Several proponents are advocating to end the practice of nationwide injunctions, which they believe go beyond the judiciary's role.

Supreme Court oral arguments on birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts stopped Justice Sonia Sotomayor from interrupting during oral arguments over birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions. The case involves the Trump administration's view on universal injunctions exceeding lower courts' powers under the Constitution.

Supreme Court debate on nationwide injunctions for Trump's policies

The Supreme Court is debating the use of nationwide injunctions on President Trump's policies, particularly his birth citizenship update. Trump's lawyers argue that the injunctions hinder public debate and policy implementation. The Department of Justice did not ask the Supreme Court to decide on birthright citizenship. Opponents of curbing nationwide injunctions fear chaos and inconsistency. Justice Clarence Thomas believes the U.S. survived without national injunctions until the 1960s. Left-leaning judges are concerned about government overreach if national injunctions are limited.

Legal challenges facing the Trump administration

Fox News host Mark Levin gives his take on legal challenges facing the Trump administration. Justice Sonia Sotomayor questions Trump's order on birthright citizenship. Supreme Court to rule on nationwide injunctions imposed by federal judges.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Birthright Citizenship

The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments challenging Trump's executive order to limit birthright citizenship, focusing on the power of nationwide injunctions. Legal experts disagree on the impact of these injunctions, with some calling them a bipartisan issue and others arguing for their necessity in cases like this. Real people, like asylum seekers Dina and Henry, are directly affected by the outcome of this case.

Limiting Federal District Court Judges' Power

Rep. Darrell Issa introduced the No Rogue Rulings Act to limit federal district court judges' power to issue nationwide injunctions, arguing that these judges are overstepping their jurisdiction. Trump's administration has faced 15 nationwide injunctions. Issa believes the bill should be balanced and would benefit the country in the long term.

Discussion on Nationwide Injunctions Against the Trump Administration by Federal Judges

Sen. Chuck Grassley and Sen. Josh Hawley discuss the issue of nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration by federal judges. Grassley sets a prompt hearing on judges blocking Trump. Various judges have issued injunctions against Trump's actions, leading to a significant number of nationwide orders. Some judges were confirmed in a bipartisan manner, while others faced opposition. Republicans express concerns about the activist nature of some judges and the challenges in blocking controversial nominees.

President Trump's Actions and Republican Legislation Against Federal Courts

President Donald Trump discusses his administration's actions against congestion pricing in New York City and his take on the budget bill. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan outlines Republican legislation to rein in the judiciary as Trump battles federal courts. Legislation includes limiting nationwide injunctions and expanding federal judgeships.

Legal Challenges Facing the Trump Administration

GOP Rep. Darrell Issa introduces the No Rogue Rulings Act to prevent federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions against a president's political agenda. Dozens of lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration. Issa's bill aims to limit the scope of nationwide injunctions.