U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez struck down California's ban on billy clubs, citing Second Amendment protection. Historical analysis showed lack of tradition against billy clubs, leading to the conclusion that citizens have a right to possess them for self-defense.
Key Points
Historical analysis showed the lack of a tradition against billy clubs
Decision emphasizes citizens' right to defend themselves with various weapons
Judge Benitez criticized California's expert for imprecise language in presenting historical facts
Pros
Upholds Second Amendment rights for citizens
Allows for the use of less-lethal weapons for self-defense
Cons
Potential increase in the presence of billy clubs in public spaces