Prince Harry's Security Detail Ruling

SOURCE www.nbcnews.com
Prince Harry was not improperly stripped of his publicly funded security detail during visits to Britain after giving up his status as a working royal and moving to the U.S. A London judge ruled that the decision to provide security on a case-by-case basis was lawful.

Key Points

  • Prince Harry was not improperly stripped of his publicly funded security detail
  • Decision to provide security on a case-by-case basis was lawful
  • Harry has had multiple legal battles related to security and tabloid publishers

Pros

  • Decision to provide security on a case-by-case basis was ruled lawful

Cons

  • Harry's claim of endangerment due to hostility on social media and news media was not fully supported