A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, ruled that some Capitol riot defendants had their sentences improperly increased due to inclusion of charges of 'interference with the administration of justice.' This ruling could impact dozens of other cases from the January 6 events.
Key Points
Federal appeals court in Washington, DC, ruled that a defendant's sentence was improperly increased due to inclusion of charges of 'interference with the administration of justice'
Ruling could impact dozens of other cases from the January 6 events
The enhancement applied in more than 100 other defendants' cases may be in question
Pros
Clarifies legal interpretation in Capitol riot cases
Could lead to review and potential reduction of sentences for other defendants
Cons
May raise questions about past sentencing practices