Donald Trump's legal battle with New York attorney general
New York attorney general disputes Donald Trump's claim about needing to sell properties at a loss to secure bond for a civil fraud fine appeal.
Key Points
- Dispute over the necessity of selling properties at a loss for bond.
- Trump's financial situation after losing civil trials.
- Attorney General's argument for a full bond for appeal.
Pros
- Attorney General Letitia James disputes Trump's claim about needing to sell properties at a loss.
- Trump has a wide array of assets he can use as collateral for the bond.
- Trump arranged a $91.6 million bond for a previous appeal, showing capability to arrange such bonds.
Cons
- Trump is running short on cash after losing two civil trials in a short period.
- Attorney General James argues that a full bond is necessary for Trump to appeal the fine.
- Trump faces four criminal prosecutions in addition to civil cases.