R. Kelly's Appeal in Racketeering Case
R. Kelly's lawyer argues that the racketeering statute was improperly used to convict the singer of sexually abusing young fans, including children, for decades. The prosecution claims that Kelly's network of aides and employees facilitated his illegal activities with underage girls.
Key Points
- Defense argues that Kelly's associates did not have the purpose to recruit girls for abuse
- Prosecution cites instances where Kelly's inner circle was aware of illegal activities
- Appeals court judges question the knowledge of employees regarding underage girls
Pros
- Defense argues that the racketeering statute was misapplied
- Raises questions about the fairness of the trial and conviction
Cons
- Prosecution claims Kelly's network aided in illegal activities with underage girls