The article discusses the potential acquisition of U.S. Steel by Nippon Steel and the implications on trade policy. It challenges the notion of protectionism and questions the supposed benefits of the deal.
Key Points
Challenges the concept of protectionism in the context of the steel deal
Argues that U.S. is not in need of foreign capital or technology injections
Raises questions about the real motives behind the acquisition
Pros
Potential injection of technology and capital into U.S. Steel
Possibility of raising productivity, wages, and employment opportunities
Cons
Concerns about underhanded motives behind the acquisition