Danish climate expert Bjorn Lomborg challenges climate alarmists' narrative by highlighting the decreasing yearly deaths from weather-related events. He advocates for cost-benefit analyses to address global warming and criticizes net-zero climate policies for being prohibitively costly.
Key Points
Climate-related disaster deaths have declined dramatically.
Net-zero climate policies are significantly costly compared to the climate problem.
Pros
Yearly deaths from weather-related events have been dropping consistently.
Advocates for the use of cost-benefit analyses for determining the best response to global warming.
Cons
Critiques net-zero climate policies as prohibitively costly.
Highlights the disconnect between extreme climate policies and their unsustainable costs.