The United States' top intelligence agency wants to ban the use of 'biased language,' including terms like 'radical Islamists' and 'jihadist,' in an effort to be more inclusive and avoid offending Muslim-Americans. Critics argue that these initiatives are part of a 'woke' cultural shift that could harm national security operations. The agency's magazine also features an article by a male intelligence officer who discusses the benefits of crossdressing.
Key Points
Banning biased language to avoid offending Muslim-Americans
Focus on inclusivity and sensitivity in communication
Criticism from Republicans and concerns about impact on national security
Article by an intelligence officer discussing crossdressing and its benefits
Pros
Promotes inclusivity and sensitivity towards Muslim-Americans
Encourages employees to be mindful of their language and its impact on others
Cons
Critics argue that these initiatives are part of a 'woke' cultural shift
Could potentially hinder national security efforts by avoiding certain terms