Experts warn that Hawaii, not covered by NATO's Article 5, could be vulnerable to attack by Vladimir Putin under a NATO loophole. This highlights a potential gap in collective defense for the US.
Key Points
Hawaii is not covered by NATO's Article 5 due to its geographical location in the Pacific
Potential loophole could leave Hawaii exposed to attacks without triggering collective defense
Experts emphasize the need to reassess and potentially expand NATO's coverage
Pros
Highlighting potential gaps in collective defense agreements
Raising awareness about the geographic limitations of NATO's protection
Cons
Creates concerns about the vulnerability of Hawaii to potential attacks
Raises questions about the effectiveness of NATO's defense mechanisms