Federal prosecutors criticize the judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case in Florida for considering flawed legal premises in potential jury instructions.
Key Points
Judge Aileen Cannon asked for proposed jury instructions that prosecutors believe are based on a flawed legal premise.
Prosecutors argue that the Presidential Records Act does not permit Trump to retain highly classified documents.
The defense and prosecution are at odds over the interpretation of the law in question.
Pros
Prosecutors are challenging flawed legal premises in potential jury instructions.
Legal experts are alarmed by the judge's order, indicating potential bias.
Prosecutors argue that the Presidential Records Act does not apply to highly classified documents in question.
Cons
There is ongoing exasperation with the judge's handling of the case.
Defense motions to dismiss the indictment remain unresolved, delaying the trial.
The case could remain unsettled until the November presidential election.