The article criticizes President Biden's handling of the unrest in the Middle East compared to the 'Trump Doctrine'. It highlights perceived weaknesses in Biden's approach and contrasts it with the strength and deterrence of the Trump administration.
Key Points
The 'Biden Doctrine' is criticized for sounding retreat and not escalating conflicts
The 'Trump Doctrine' is praised for its deterrence backed by overwhelming force
The article suggests that under Trump, certain tragic events in the Middle East could have been prevented
Pros
Critiques President Biden's foreign policy approach
Highlights the importance of strength and deterrence in international relations
Cons
May be perceived as biased towards the Trump administration
Does not provide a balanced view of both administrations