Legal analyst Jonathan Turley criticizes the New York trial against former President Donald Trump as absurd, arguing that it is creating a criminal code just for Trump and lacks real legal basis.
Key Points
The trial involves allegations of falsifying business records related to payments to Stormy Daniels
Turley argues that the opponents of Trump would have been better off with just one case based on real law and precedent
New Yorkers elected a district attorney who ran on prosecuting Trump, leading to criticism of the trial
Cons
The trial is criticized as creating a criminal code specifically for Trump
The indictment is considered by many as absurd and lacking real legal basis