Half of the potential jurors in the Trump hush money case were excused for not being fair and impartial. This raised concerns about public integrity of courts and bias against Trump.
Key Points
Half of second round potential jurors excused for bias
Concerns raised about public integrity and bias in legal system
Only 6 jurors selected so far, need 6 more and 6 alternates
Pros
Ensures fair and impartial jury selection process
Highlights concerns about public integrity and bias in the legal system
Cons
Potential delays in the trial due to need for more jurors and alternates