The most significant antitrust trial in 25 years involving Google and the DOJ is coming to an end in Washington. The trial centers around accusations of Google suppressing search rivals through anti-competitive agreements. Google argues that it provides users with plenty of alternatives and that winning agreements based on having a better product is not harmful to competition.
Key Points
Accusations of Google suppressing search rivals through anti-competitive agreements
Google argues that having a better product is not harmful to competition
Concerns about Google's alleged monopolization of advertising
Pros
Google provides users with plenty of alternatives in online search
Competition in search has never been more varied or significant according to Google
Cons
Accusations of Google suppressing search rivals through anti-competitive agreements
Concerns about Google's alleged monopolization of advertising