Legal analysis of Stormy Daniels' testimony in the New York v. Trump case
Legal experts question Stormy Daniels' credibility in the New York v. Trump case, suggesting her testimony may have damaged the prosecution's case.
Key Points
- Some legal experts believe Stormy Daniels' editorializing and loathing of Trump may have hurt the case
- Daniels' detailed account of the alleged encounter and her emotional responses under cross-examination are highlighted
- Questions raised about the impact of Daniels' testimony on the trial and potential for appeal
Pros
- Legal experts provide critical analysis of Stormy Daniels' testimony
- Insight into the potential impact on the prosecution's case
Cons
- Concerns raised about the credibility of Stormy Daniels' testimony