Challenging absentee ballot witness requirement in Wisconsin
Federal judge rules against Democratic law firm challenging absentee ballot witness requirement in Wisconsin, citing lack of sense in interpretation.
Key Points
- Federal judge James Peterson ruled against Elias Law Group's challenge
- Wisconsin's state statute requires witness certification for absentee ballots
- Plaintiffs argued the witness requirement violated voting and civil rights acts
Pros
- Upholding state statute for absentee ballot requirements
- Ensuring integrity of absentee voting process
Cons
- Challenges from Democratic law firm could lead to legal battles
- Potential controversy over voting rights and civil rights acts