Legal Controversy Surrounding Trump's Civil Fraud Case in New York
Former Obama attorney general criticizes Supreme Court ruling on Trump's immunity claim, Trump's lawyers accuse judge of prohibited communications in New York civil fraud case, requesting recusal, Judge Engoron found Trump liable for more than $350 million in damages in the civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James
Key Points
- Former Obama attorney general criticizes Supreme Court ruling on Trump's immunity claim
- Trump's lawyers accuse Judge Arthur Engoron of prohibited communications in the civil fraud case
- Judge Engoron found Trump liable for over $350 million in damages
- Allegations of ex parte communication and investigation by the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
Pros
- Ensuring fair and impartial trial proceedings
- Holding individuals accountable for fraudulent activities
Cons
- Allegations of prohibited communications by the judge
- Request for recusal based on perceived bias