Judge Aileen Cannon's handling of the Mar-a-Lago documents case is facing scrutiny for delays and unusual decisions, with concerns raised about inexperience, bias, and favoring former President Trump. Critics question the slow pace, lack of trial date, and inviting outside groups into the courtroom. Some argue her actions are aiding Trump's desire for delay.
Key Points
Conducting hearings to weigh motions unlikely to succeed
Facing criticism for foot-dragging and lack of timely decisions
Raised concerns about bias, inexperience, and favoritism towards Trump
Pros
Taking time to carefully weigh pretrial motions
Deeply skeptical of bid to suppress evidence
Challenging both prosecution and defense arguments