Supreme Court decision puts EPA's 'good neighbor' rule limiting air pollution on hold in nearly a dozen states due to legal challenges. Conservative-led court restricts federal agency powers, impacting regulations on air and water pollution. Rule aims to protect downwind states from out-of-state pollution, with implications for clean air standards and health of vulnerable groups.
Key Points
Supreme Court decision puts 'good neighbor' rule on hold in nearly a dozen states
Conservative-led court limits EPA's authority to fight air and water pollution
Rule aims to protect downwind states from unwanted pollution
Implications for clean air standards and health of vulnerable groups
Pros
Protects downwind states from out-of-state pollution
Addresses interstate air pollution and clean air standards
Critical for public health, especially vulnerable groups
Cons
Costly and ineffective according to challengers
May lead to increased operating costs for fossil fuel-fired power plants
Critics view it as government overreach and a threat to the energy sector