Supreme Court sidesteps ruling on Idaho abortion law vs. federal law
The Supreme Court sidestepped ruling on whether Idaho's strict abortion law conflicts with a federal law requiring stabilizing care for emergency room patients, including pregnant women needing abortions. The lower court ruling allowing abortions in emergencies remains in effect for now.
Key Points
- Supreme Court dismisses Idaho officials' appeal on abortion law
- Justice Department continues to push interpretation of federal law
- Conservative and liberal justices vote against deciding the case
- Idaho's strict abortion law faces legal challenges
Pros
- Lower court ruling allowing abortions in emergency situations remains in effect
- Women in Idaho have access to emergency care guaranteed under federal law
Cons
- Legal question remains unresolved
- Confusion on whether federal law trumps state bans continues