Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity
The Supreme Court ruled that presidents have substantial immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. Justice Thomas questioned the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment. The case was sent back to lower courts to determine which acts were official. Trump pleaded not guilty to charges related to the Capitol riot and election interference.
Key Points
- Presidents have substantial immunity for official acts
- Justice Thomas questioned the appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith
- Case sent back to determine which acts were official
- Trump pleaded not guilty to charges related to Capitol riot and election interference
Pros
- Presidents have substantial immunity for official acts
- Respecting the protections the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty
Cons
- Questions about the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment