Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity
Former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal criticizes the Supreme Court ruling in Donald Trump's presidential immunity case, calling it a blueprint for ending the rule of law.
Key Points
- Supreme Court ruling criticized for potentially undermining the rule of law
- Katyal suggests the ruling enables presidents to evade accountability for illegal actions by labeling them as official acts
Cons
- Potential for abuse by presidents to shield illegal acts under the label of 'official act'