Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its implications
Former Obama adviser Van Jones criticizes Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, suggesting it could lead to criminal behavior by presidents like Trump. Jones argues that the ruling gives Trump a 'license to thug.' Conservative commentator Scott Jennings counters by highlighting the constitutional means of restraining presidents through impeachment.
Key Points
- Supreme Court ruled on presidential immunity in Trump v. United States
- Van Jones criticizes the ruling, warns of potential criminal behavior by future presidents
- Scott Jennings argues that impeachment is a means to restrain rogue presidents