Delay in Former President Trump's Sentencing
Manhattan district attorney's office defers to judge on delaying former President Trump's sentencing in hush money criminal case. Prosecutors reject some of Trump's arguments but agree to delay for orderly appellate litigation. Trump's conviction marked the first criminal conviction of any former president.
Key Points
- Manhattan DA defers decision on delaying Trump's sentencing to judge
- Trump demands delay in sentencing until after the November presidential election
- Prosecutors reject some of Trump's arguments but agree to delay in light of new developments
- Trump's conviction on 34 counts marked the first criminal conviction of any former president
- Legal battle revolves around Supreme Court's immunity ruling and its impact on Trump's conviction
Pros
- Allowing for orderly appellate litigation
- Reducing the risk of a disruptive stay from an appellate court
- Ensuring fair legal process
Cons
- Potential delay in justice being served
- Ongoing legal battles affecting public perception