Stanford professor cited nonexistent sources in affidavit supporting Minnesota's deepfake ban law

SOURCE www.breitbart.com
Stanford professor Jeff Hancock cited nonexistent sources in an affidavit supporting Minnesota's deepfake ban law, sparking debate about AI-generated content in legal matters. Opposing lawyers claim the false references were generated by AI, casting doubt on the credibility of the document.

Key Points

  • Opposing lawyers claim Stanford professor Jeff Hancock used AI to generate false references in his legal document
  • The debate revolves around the role of AI-generated content in legal matters
  • The incident raises concerns about the credibility of expert declarations and the potential misuse of AI in legal proceedings

Pros

  • Highlighting potential misuse of AI-generated content in legal proceedings

Cons

  • Undermining the credibility of the affidavit supporting the deepfake ban law