Accusation of AI-generated Testimony in Politically-Charged Case
A Stanford University 'misinformation expert' is accused of using AI to create fake testimony in a politically-charged case involving a satirical YouTuber and Minnesota's ban on political deepfakes. The testimony has been called into question by the plaintiff's lawyers due to citing a non-existent study. The authenticity and reliability of the entire declaration are being challenged.
Key Points
- Accusation against Stanford University 'misinformation expert' Jeff Hancock
- Allegations of using AI to fabricate testimony in a case involving political deepfakes
- Questions raised about the authenticity and reliability of the expert declaration