The Department of Justice's internal watchdog found no evidence of political motivation in subpoenas of communication records of Democratic members of Congress and reporters during the first Trump administration. However, the leak investigations targeted a larger number of congressional staffers than previously known. The report raises concerns about chilling Congress's ability to conduct oversight and the media's ability to report on sensitive government issues.
Key Points
43 congressional staffers had their communication records subpoenaed
8 reporters from CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post also had their communication records subpoenaed
Justice Department did not have a policy addressing the use of such subpoenas at the time
Subpoenas included gag orders preventing notification to those whose records were subpoenaed
Pros
No evidence of political motivation by federal prosecutors in subpoenas
Strengthened rules and policies implemented by the Justice Department under the Biden administration
Cons
Leak investigations targeted a larger number of congressional staffers than previously known
Concerns raised about chilling effect on Congress's oversight and media's reporting