A man diagnosed with sexsomnia was acquitted of rape after having non-consensual sex with a woman while experiencing an episode of sexsomnia. The judge emphasized that a jury should base their decision on current laws and evidence, not on personal beliefs.
Key Points
Man diagnosed with sexsomnia acquitted of rape
Judge emphasized the importance of following existing laws
Jury deliberated on whether the man was conscious during the act
Pros
Legal system upheld the principle of innocent until proven guilty
Increased awareness about sexsomnia as a medical condition
Cons
Lack of specific laws or regulations regarding sexsomnia and criminal responsibility
Complexity in determining whether a person was conscious or unconscious during the act