Former national security adviser John Bolton believes acquiring Greenland is of critical importance to U.S. security, but disagrees with President Trump's approach. Bolton suggests alternative paths to achieve security goals in the Arctic region without resorting to public statements or military force.
Key Points
Acquisition of Greenland is seen as crucial for U.S. security interests.
Trump's public statements and approach have complicated the negotiation process.
Alternative paths to enhance security in the Arctic region without resorting to force exist.
Pros
Acquiring Greenland could enhance U.S. and allies' security interests in countering threats from Russia and China.
There are options for Greenland to maintain considerable independence even under U.S. sovereignty.
Potential for Greenland to become a NATO member if it decides to become independent.
Cons
President Trump's public statements and approach have potentially hindered negotiations for acquiring Greenland.
Trump's refusal to rule out military force in acquiring Greenland has been criticized.
Trump's casual attitude towards serious matters like national security has raised concerns.