14 states are suing to block DOGE from accessing federal data as legal battles over President Trump's executive orders continue. Federal judges are issuing pre-trial injunctions without requiring plaintiffs to post injunction bonds, potentially breaking the law. The Trump administration may use legal weapons to rein in the lower courts by enforcing Rule 65(c) which requires posting bonds for injunctions.
Key Points
14 states suing to block DOGE from accessing federal data
Federal judges issuing pre-trial injunctions without requiring injunction bonds
Enforcement of Rule 65(c) could restore the rule of law and deter frivolous claims
Pros
Potential reinforcement of legal procedures governing pre-trial injunctions
Enforcement of Rule 65(c) could deter frivolous claims and ensure fair legal processes
Cons
Activist judges potentially ignoring legal requirements for injunction bonds
Possible hindrance to quick pre-trial wins for plaintiffs challenging administration policies