Dr. Jay Bhattacharya defends Trump's decision to cap indirect research costs at NIH, pledges to focus on research benefiting health outcomes, and emphasizes transparency and embracing dissenting ideas. He also addresses concerns about diversity in research and vaccines.
Key Points
Bhattacharya defends Trump's 15% cap on indirect research costs at NIH
Pledges to focus on research with direct health benefits and transparency
Emphasizes embracing dissenting ideas and promoting meaningful outcomes
Agrees with Cassidy on no link between vaccines and autism
Supports halting the use of aborted fetal tissue in research
Pros
Focus on research directly benefiting health outcomes
Commitment to transparency and embracing dissenting ideas
Efforts to rid agency's research portfolio of frivolous projects
Cons
Concerns about potential impact on minority health research
Controversial stance on vaccines and autism linkage
Support for halting use of aborted fetal tissue in research