Bryan Kohberger, a murder suspect in Idaho, is seeking to exclude his Amazon purchase history as evidence in his upcoming trial for the deaths of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argues that the Amazon evidence is vague, incomplete, and unfairly prejudicial.
Key Points
Defense seeks to exclude Amazon purchase history from trial
Concerns raised about the nature of the evidence and lack of expert opinion
Kohberger's defense team argues the evidence is unfairly prejudicial
Pros
Defense team argues Amazon evidence is vague and incomplete
Claims Amazon's AI-driven algorithm may have influenced user behavior
Raises concerns about lack of disclosure of expert opinion
Cons
Prosecutors may argue that Amazon evidence is crucial to the case