Justice Department vs. Federal Judge in Washington, D.C.

SOURCE www.npr.org
A federal judge in Washington, D.C. rejected the Justice Department's attempt to remove her from a case involving President Trump's executive order. She accused the department of trying to undermine the judicial system by attacking her. The judge emphasized the importance of fair and impartial hearings and the role of the courts in adjudicating legal matters.

Key Points

  • Judge Howell rejected the Justice Department's attempt to disqualify her from a case involving Trump's executive order
  • She emphasized that fact-finding is the role of the courts and not the President or the Department of Justice
  • Howell highlighted the need for fair and impartial hearings for all litigating parties

Pros

  • Judge Howell stood up against attempts to discredit the federal judiciary
  • Emphasized the importance of fair and impartial hearings
  • Highlighted the role of courts in adjudicating legal matters

Cons

  • Accusations of bias and animus from the Justice Department