Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested letting bird flu spread in poultry flocks unchecked, risking increased chances of the virus changing to spread easily among humans. Scientists oppose this strategy as risky and unlikely to yield breakthroughs in finding therapeutics or genetic resistance.
Key Points
Culling on its own has not stopped bird flu from infecting poultry
Risk of bird flu changing in dangerous ways increases with unchecked spread
Vaccinating poultry could be a possible way to mitigate harm
Stopping culling could reduce the country's food security
Therapeutics in poultry are currently not seen as a viable solution
Pros
Identifying birds immune to bird flu
Testing therapeutics in flocks
Looking for birds with genetic inclination for immunity
Cons
Letting bird flu spread unchecked can exacerbate the problem
Risky strategy with unlikely breakthroughs
Could lead to serious harm to poultry, other animals, and humans