Microsoft's antitrust case in the late 1990s serves as a key reference point for the current antitrust case involving Google and the U.S. government. The ruling against Microsoft helped shape current antitrust laws and is being used as a guide for deciding penalties against Google. Both cases revolve around allegations of monopolistic practices in the tech industry.
Key Points
Microsoft's antitrust case from the late 1990s serves as a key reference point for the ongoing antitrust case involving Google and the U.S. government
The ruling against Microsoft helped shape current antitrust laws, especially in relation to tech companies
The penalties imposed on Microsoft set a legal precedent for how the U.S. government could pursue monopolistic practices in the tech industry
Google is facing similar allegations of monopolistic practices and the DOJ is using the Microsoft case as a guide for deciding penalties against Google
Pros
Established legal precedent for pursuing monopolistic practices in the tech industry
Guiding current antitrust laws and decisions against big tech companies
Opened the door for new competitors like Apple and Google
Cons
Controversy over whether Microsoft's penalties were adequate or if the company got off lightly