The Supreme Court is considering President Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship, focusing on the power of judges to block presidential policies nationwide. The administration argues that universal injunctions stymie the president's agenda. The court may limit the scope of injunctions to apply only to specific parties. The issue of universal injunctions has been contentious across multiple administrations.
Key Points
Focus on judges' authority to block policies nationwide
Administration's argument against universal injunctions
Potential impact on birthright citizenship policy implementation
Pros
Potential to clarify the power of judges to block presidential policies nationwide
May provide guidance on the scope of injunctions in legal cases
Cons
Controversy surrounding the Trump administration's approach to executive power
Concerns about limiting judicial oversight over illegal actions