Supreme Court Decision on Apache Stronghold Case
The Supreme Court's decision not to hear Apache Stronghold v. United States risks eroding religious liberty and handing over sacred Native American land to a mining company linked to the Chinese Communist Party.
Key Points
- The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case jeopardizes religious liberty and national sovereignty
- The land transfer could result in sacred Apache ground being controlled by a company with ties to China
Pros
- Highlighting the importance of protecting sacred Native American land and upholding religious freedom
- Drawing attention to the potential geopolitical implications of handing over key resources to a company linked to the Chinese Communist Party
Cons
- Risking the destruction of a historic and spiritual landmark for the Apache tribe
- Potentially setting a dangerous precedent for religious freedom on federal land