Criticism of Political Prosecutors and Judges in the Legal System

Alina Habba, the new acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey appointed by President Trump, criticizes the broken system of political prosecutors and judges. She highlights her experience defending Trump and vows to focus on fighting crime in her new role. She condemns the use of lawfare tactics by non-political officials and calls for accountability for those who weaponized the legal system against Trump.

Maine State Rep. Laurel Libby's Lawsuit on Trans Athlete Inclusion Battle

Republican Maine state Rep. Laurel Libby challenges censure for opposing transgender athletes in women's sports, case moved to Rhode Island due to judges' recusal citing conflict of interest. Biden-appointed Judge Melissa DuBose to oversee the case, raising concerns about impartiality.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's Experience and Accomplishments

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson discusses her experiences as a minority Justice on the Supreme Court, reveals her outlet for frustrations, shares personal accomplishments, and reflects on her groundbreaking role in the judiciary.

Criminal Trial of Former President Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts of business fraud in Manhattan. Conservative commentators claimed the jury was biased, but the judge did not allow questions about jurors' political affiliations. Jurors were selected based on their impartiality, with some expressing positive and negative views of Trump. Trump's sentencing was delayed due to a Supreme Court ruling granting him immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts.

Trump Business Records Trial

Alina Habba, a lawyer representing former President Donald Trump, believes the jurors in his business records trial should have been sequestered over Memorial Day weekend to prevent influence from media, friends, and family. She expressed concerns about the jurors' exposure to biased news sources and their ability to remain impartial. The trial involves 34 counts of falsifying business records in relation to payments made to Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election.

Display of upside-down American flag at Justice Alito's house

After the 2020 presidential election, some Trump supporters displayed upside-down American flags, including at Supreme Court Justice Alito's residence. This raised concerns about bias and impartiality in cases related to the election and the Capitol riot. The flag was seen as a political statement, violating ethics rules.

Trial of former President Donald Trump

Trial of former President Donald Trump lacks clarity on alleged crimes, with questionable connections among prosecutors and judge. Potential conflicts of interest raise concerns about fairness and impartiality.

Trump Hush Money Case

A potential juror in the Trump hush money case claimed she could be fair and impartial despite being a registered Democrat with no feelings towards Trump. The Trump defense team challenged her eligibility as a juror. Manhattan DA alleges Trump violated state law by falsifying business records related to hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

Former President Donald Trump's Hush Money Criminal Trial

Seven jurors have been selected for former President Donald Trump's hush money criminal trial in New York. Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records in relation to alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels during his 2016 campaign.

Trump's Trial Jury Selection

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan allowed a juror who celebrated Trump's 2020 loss on social media to remain in the jury pool for Trump's trial. The trial could last until June.

Challenges of Jury Selection for Former President Donald Trump's Trial

Jury selection for the trial of former President Donald Trump poses unique challenges due to his polarizing nature, with the court aiming to find impartial jurors who can base their decision on evidence and law. The process involves extensive questioning to detect bias and ensure fairness.

Jury Selection for Donald Trump's Hush Money Case

Jury selection for former President Donald Trump's hush money case presents unique challenges due to his polarizing nature. The process involves questioning potential jurors to ensure impartiality and fairness.