Trump Hush Money Case
A potential juror in the Trump hush money case claimed she could be fair and impartial despite being a registered Democrat with no feelings towards Trump. The Trump defense team challenged her eligibility as a juror. Manhattan DA alleges Trump violated state law by falsifying business records related to hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.
Key Points
- Juror's ability to be fair and impartial questioned by Trump defense team
- Manhattan DA alleges Trump falsified business records in relation to hush money payment
- Potential jurors showing bias or inability to be impartial in the case
Pros
- Juror claims she can be fair and impartial despite political affiliation
- Case highlights importance of impartiality in legal proceedings
Cons
- Challenges to juror eligibility may raise concerns about bias in the trial