After the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq in the early 2000s, military surgeons faced challenges but innovated to achieve the highest rate of survival for battlefield wounds in history. However, post-war cuts to military healthcare risk reversing these gains.
Key Points
Military surgeons faced challenges during the post-9/11 wars but innovated to improve battlefield medicine
Outsourcing of military healthcare has led to a decrease in medical staff and readiness
Future conflicts may require different approaches to battlefield medicine, especially without air superiority
Pros
Achieved the highest rate of survival for battlefield wounds in history
Innovations like pop-up surgical teams and new tourniquet designs saved lives on the front lines
Cons
Post-war cuts to military healthcare threaten to reverse medical advances
Outsourcing of care to civilian institutions has negatively impacted readiness