Former transgender influencer and 'Gender Madness' author Oli London shares his perspective on the debate surrounding gender transition treatments for minors. The Supreme Court appears divided over state bans on gender transition 'treatments' for minors, with Justice Gorsuch notably silent during arguments. The debate also touches on the impact on women's sports if Tennessee's law protecting minors from gender-affirming care is subject to Constitutional scrutiny.
Key Points
Justice Gorsuch remained silent during the arguments, raising questions about his stance on the issue
The Biden administration and ACLU argue for the Constitutionality of gender transition treatments for minors
The debate extends to the impact on women's sports and competitive fairness
Pros
The Court is considering the impact of Tennessee's law on gender transition treatments for minors
The debate sheds light on the potential consequences for women's sports and gender equality policies
Cons
There are disagreements among the Justices regarding the constitutionality of gender transition treatments for minors
The potential implications for women's sports and transgender rights remain a contentious issue