Hamit Coskun set fire to a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish embassy in London to protest Islamic extremism in his home country, was assaulted, charged with a 'religiously aggravated public order offense,' and convicted. He argues that he was attacking ideas, not people, and warns about the blurring of categories in lawful criticism of religion.
Key Points
Challenging the blurring of categories between criticism of a religious ideology and hatred towards believers
Stressing the need for the protection of free speech and the right to criticize religion
Highlighting the impact of political Islam on secular societies
Pros
Highlighting the importance of freedom of expression and political protest
Raising awareness about the impact of religious authoritarianism
Cons
Being charged with a 'religiously aggravated public order offense'
Facing assault and violence for expressing a political viewpoint