Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity

The Supreme Court ruled that presidents have substantial immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. Justice Thomas questioned the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment. The case was sent back to lower courts to determine which acts were official. Trump pleaded not guilty to charges related to the Capitol riot and election interference.

Special Counsel's Evidence for Gag Order on Donald Trump

Special Counsel Jack Smith's team has submitted evidence supporting a gag order on Donald Trump to prevent him from making public statements that could endanger law enforcement officials. Trump falsely claimed Biden ordered deadly force during a search at Mar-a-Lago. Prosecutors argue that Trump's rhetoric has led to threats against judges and court staff. Examples include swatting incidents and threatening messages, as well as attacks on law enforcement agencies by Trump supporters. Smith's team emphasizes the danger posed by Trump's inflammatory language and urges the court to impose a gag order.

Controversy over handling of documents found at Mar-a-Lago

Special Counsel Jack Smith defends government's handling of documents found at Mar-a-Lago, refuting claims of evidence manipulation by Republicans. Department of Justice admits some evidence shown in public photos were props, not original items. Judge Aileen Cannon under scrutiny for handling defense motions. Joel B. Pollak, Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News, provides commentary.

Legal proceedings involving special counsel Jack Smith and former President Donald Trump

A court hearing in Florida is ongoing to determine if special counsel Jack Smith can prosecute former President Donald Trump, with Trump's lawyers arguing that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional.

Donald Trump's rhetoric and actions

Former Rep. Ken Buck criticizes Donald Trump for using harsh rhetoric to embolden his base but not always following through on his statements, specifically regarding targeting political opponents.

Legal battle over Trump's classified records trial

Former President Trump's trial for alleged improper retention of classified records is postponed indefinitely as judge expands hearing to explore legality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment. Former AG Meese argues Smith's appointment is unlawful. AG Garland defends move, stating regulations permit such appointments. Various hearings and deadlines set, including one on June 21 to address the legality of Smith's appointment.

Legal proceedings in former President Donald Trump's classified documents case

Judge Aileen Cannon is delaying the court schedule in former President Donald Trump's classified documents case, planning a hearing on Trump's request to declare the special counsel's appointment invalid, allowing political partisans and scholars to join the oral arguments, and facing challenges to the special counsel's authority.

House Judiciary Committee Contempt Resolution Against Attorney General Merrick Garland

The House Judiciary Committee passed a resolution to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for failing to disclose audio recordings of President Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur. Republicans maintain a narrow majority in the House to pass the resolution. Garland defied a final warning to comply with a subpoena for the recording despite several warnings and requests. Biden asserted executive privilege to prevent disclosure of the audio. The White House previously bragged about not asserting executive privilege over Hur's probe into Biden for mishandling classified documents.

President Biden's executive privilege assertion over interview with special counsel

President Biden asserts executive privilege over his interview with special counsel Hur to prevent Congress from obtaining audio recordings. Attorney General Garland faces contempt of Congress for refusal to hand over the recording. Biden experienced mental lapses during the interview. Executive branch asserts official cannot be prosecuted for contempt of Congress. White House criticizes demand for audio recordings as politically motivated.

House Speaker Mike Johnson's stance on Special Counsel investigations into Trump

House Speaker Mike Johnson speaks out against the N.Y. v. Trump criminal trial and suggests defunding the U.S. Office of Special Counsel to prevent abuse of authority. He pledges to work on measures to rein in Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigations into former President Trump.

Political Support for Trump

Speaker Mike Johnson travelled to a New York courtroom to appear by Donald Trump, despite ruling out using his power to aid Trump in legal battles. Johnson's coalition government was saved by Democrats. Johnson announced he would not stop special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Trump. Trump offered tepid support for Johnson after a photo op at Mar-a-Lago. Johnson surrendered leverage on the FAA bill to the Senate, despite pressure from some Republicans to defund Smith's office.

Republican Speaker Mike Johnson's stance on defunding special counsel Jack Smith's office

Speaker Mike Johnson refused to defund special counsel Jack Smith's office despite pressure from fellow Republicans, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Trump showed support for defunding Smith but suggested the timing was not right for ousting Johnson.

Legal Challenges Facing Donald Trump

Donald Trump's hush-money trial in New York and other legal challenges are highlighted, including upcoming jury selection and the first criminal trial of a former sitting president. Special counsel Jack Smith is also facing significant legal battles in different cases.

Legal dispute over Trump's classified documents case

Special counsel Jack Smith may seek to have the judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case recused due to disagreements over jury instructions and the application of the Presidential Records Act.

Legal Dispute Between Special Counsel Jack Smith and Judge Aileen Cannon in Donald Trump's Classified Documents Case

Special counsel Jack Smith is frustrated with Judge Aileen Cannon over delays and contentious rulings in the case against Donald Trump for stashing classified secrets at Mar-a-Lago. The strained dynamic between them has intensified, leading to a public debate and concerns about the case's progress.

Legal Battle Over Handling of Classified Material by Former President Trump

Special Counsel Jack Smith accuses Judge Aileen Cannon of flawed understanding in case against former President Trump over mishandling classified material. Trump's team claims broad authority to take records as personal. Smith threatens appeal court review.

Trump's mishandling of classified documents case

Special counsel criticizes judge's request for jury instructions in Trump's mishandling of classified documents case, arguing it is based on a flawed legal premise. Trump's defense relies on the Presidential Records Act, claiming he had the authority to determine which documents are personal or presidential. Prosecutors refute Trump's defense as pure fiction.

Legal Battle over Trump's Mishandling of Classified Documents

Special counsel criticizes judge's order regarding jury instructions in Trump's mishandling of classified documents case, arguing that the legal premise is flawed and could lead to a directed verdict in Trump's favor. Trump's defense relies on the Presidential Records Act, claiming he had the authority to decide document classification. Prosecutors dispute this, stating Trump's invocation of the PRA is fiction.

Defending Democracy Against Authoritarian Forces

Representative Jamie Raskin discusses the election in November, special counsel Robert Hur's testimony, and the importance of defending democracy and freedom against authoritarian forces rallying around Donald Trump.

Political Interference in Justice Department Investigations

Former Special Counsel Robert Hur testifies that the White House tried to interfere with his report on President Joe Biden's handling of classified documents, leading to tensions between Democrats and the White House.

House Committee Testimony on President Biden's Handling of Classified Documents

Former special counsel Robert Hur testified before a House committee on President Biden's handling of classified documents, defending his decision not to pursue criminal charges. The testimony sparked a political debate on Biden's memory and age, with Republicans questioning the decision and Democrats accusing Hur of being politically motivated. The hearing also highlighted the differences between Biden and Trump's handling of classified materials.

GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley questions Special Counsel Robert Hur's decision not to recommend charges for President Biden

GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley questions Special Counsel Robert Hur's decision not to recommend charges for President Biden based on a 'perverse' implication that the current prosecution of former President Trump influenced the decision. The report found that Biden willfully mishandled classified materials but did not recommend charges due to his age and mental state.

House Hearing on Special Counsel Robert Hur's Report

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff accuses Special Counsel Robert Hur of playing politics with his report on President Biden’s handling of classified documents, leading to a contentious House hearing. Hur denies the accusations, stating that his report was meant to be comprehensive and thorough, not politically motivated.

Special Counsel Report on President Joe Biden's Handling of Classified Materials

Special Counsel Robert Hur corrected Democrats' claims that his report exonerated President Joe Biden for mishandling classified materials, stating that the word 'exoneration' does not appear in the report. Hur described Biden as an elderly man with a poor memory but could not charge him with 'willfully retaining' classified documents.

Former Special Counsel Testifies on President Biden's Handling of Classified Records

Former Special Counsel Robert Hur testified that he did not exonerate President Biden in his report on mishandling of classified records, despite Democratic lawmakers' claims of complete exoneration.

Special Counsel Investigation into President Joe Biden's Handling of Classified Documents

Special counsel Robert Hur testifies that politics played no part in his investigation or report into President Joe Biden's handling of classified documents. The hearing turns into a proxy battle between Biden and Donald Trump. Biden cooperated with the investigation, while Trump is accused of concealing classified documents. Hur recommended no criminal charges for Biden due to insufficient evidence.

The potential repercussions of attacking Attorney Robert Hur during his testimony on Capitol Hill

Attorney Robert Hur, a Republican lawyer and former federal prosecutor, oversaw an investigation into Joe Biden's possession of classified documents and concluded there was insufficient evidence for criminal charges. Democrats should be cautious in attacking him during his testimony on Capitol Hill as he could potentially damage Biden's reputation further. Hur has a history of political independence and may have more damaging information not widely reported. The report on Biden's memory and handling of classified documents has flaws but also raises valid concerns.

Special Counsel Robert Hur's Congressional Hearing on President Biden's Memory and Mental State

Special Counsel Robert Hur's upcoming congressional hearing on President Biden's memory and mental state reveals frequent memory lapses and contradictions in claims. Biden struggled to remember details about his son's death and his term as vice president, raising concerns about national security.

Special Counsel Robert Hur's Testimony on President Biden's Memory and Mental State

Former Special Counsel Robert Hur is set to testify on President Biden's memory and mental state, defending his report on Biden's handling of classified documents. Hur maintained that his assessment was fair and necessary, pushing back against accusations of politicization.

Special Counsel Robert Hur Testifies on President Joe Biden's Handling of Classified Documents

Special Counsel Robert Hur testifies before Congress about his report on President Joe Biden's handling of classified documents, highlighting Biden's memory lapses but ultimately concluding no criminal charges should be filed. Biden denies intentionally retaining classified information and asserts his staff managed sensitive documents. Republicans and Democrats use the hearing to advance their political agendas.

Comparison of Trump and Biden's handling of classified documents

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett discusses Trump's lawyers citing presidential immunity in classified document case, comparing it to President Biden's handling of sensitive information. Special counsel Jack Smith responds to Trump's motion to dismiss indictment based on selective prosecution.

Trump's Federal Indictment and Legal Defense

Attorneys for former President Donald Trump filed motions to dismiss a federal indictment led by Special Counsel Jack Smith in the Southern District of Florida regarding Trump's handling of classified documents. The motions argue that Smith's appointment was unlawful and that Trump's possession of the documents was not unauthorized under the Presidential Records Act.

Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis' Relationship with Special Counsel Nathan Wade

The District Attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, Fani Willis, is facing scrutiny for her romantic relationship with Special Counsel Nathan Wade, who was hired to help prosecute former President Donald Trump. Trump's defense team alleges Wade visited Willis at her home multiple times late at night, based on cellphone data. Willis and Wade deny dating prior to 2022. The Trump team is trying to get Willis removed from the case due to ethics concerns.